Quality Control on Cracking Data
Have
you ever been promised reliable results based on the enforcing of a well established
Quality Control Plan? Unfortunately, too often the results are not what was expected due
to a lack of objectivity in the definition of the procedures but also because the
procedures are simply too complex and demanding to be enforced effectively. I am
especially referring to the quality control of cracking data that contrary to Roughness or
Rutting Data is a lot more difficult to implement. To resolve that issue GIE decided in
2000 to develop quality control procedures exclusively dedicated to the validation of
cracking data.
The process developed involves 3
steps. The first step begins during the data
collection phase and involves the in-situ recording of a the PASER
index (*) on all the pavement sections of a network. Once the automated raw data and
other visual keyboard entries completed, the data is then processed to extract the
quantities. At this stage the step 2 of the QC plan is ready to be launched. This step consists calculating an
Automated PASER Index derived from the quantities recorded by either the Automated or
Windshield Rater Systems.
Once
in hand, the two Indexes, are compared. The Visual Index provided by the operator and the
Automated Index calculated from actual quantities, are compared.
In step 3, any significant errors (PASER Difference
> 1) between the subjective and automated PASER Index requires verification. Once
this situation occurs cracking results are verified against pavement referenced digital
images captured at a preset interval and edited as needed using an image interpretation
software. The tool allows to browse in continuous play mode or sequentially through
pavement images collected during the survey. When browsing the images, the
interface indicate to the operator the distresses detected by the data
collection systems. At this stage the user is allowed through the interface to edit
and modify the quantity report and to re-calculate a section condition index. The
tool may also be use to verify 100% of all the data collected on a network depending on
the cracking protocol used or on the level of precision expected.
Image
Intepretation Software Features
Fully integrated
Surface Disitress Evaluation capabilities according to several Surface Distress Protocols.
Fully integrated
Inventory Element Evaluation capabilities
Results
extracted from the data collection systems are tagged through the interface to digital
images sampled every 10 meters. By browsing through the images the software displays
distress extents, types and severities detected by the systems through distress color
coded buttons.
(*) The PASER Index is based on a roadway management
system originally developed by Phil Scher, Transportation Planner of the Wisconsin
Northwest Regional Planning Commission. The index varies from one (1) to ten (10) and is
designed to provide information on asphalt and concrete pavement conditions. In addition,
the PASER is also designed to propose a network level a Maintenance & Rehabilitation
program. See (Ref.:
Project 2001 GIE/City of Novi,Michigan) for more details on the index.
|
 |
Latest news
See our latest
tool! Our New Geographical Visualization
Interface. Visualize through the use of a
single application an unlimited quantity of
infrastructure data elements including pavement and right-of-way imaging. Read more
Want a
great site to help you design your web page? Visit Proeffect.com.
|
 |
 |